Automotive · Consumer Sentiment Survey Benchmark

Chains passed dealers. The retention shift is structural.

The Ducker Carlisle Consumer Sentiment Survey: Changing Auto Service Dynamics Benchmark identifies seven retention drivers, the chains taking share, and what servicers, OEMs, and dealer groups can do about it.

FormatIndustry Report
SectorAutomotive Aftermarket
Read Time18 minutes
-10%
Drop in dealer service retention since 2019.
39→ 36%
Retention rate, 2019 versus today.

70%
Of chain customers using financing as a primary draw.
22pt
Channel-share swing from dealers to chains over five years.
EVs are not the cause of the retention shift. Quick lubes and tire chains have outflanked dealers on convenience and financing, and the data shows the gap widening across every cohort the industry tracks.
Where Share Is Moving

Channel share is shifting away from dealer service.

The Ducker Carlisle Consumer Sentiment Survey: Changing Auto Service Dynamics dataset tracks where customers are taking routine service work. Quick lube and tire chains have widened their lead on convenience, walk-in availability, and financing. Independent shops hold steady. Dealer service is the only channel losing measurable ground.

For the first time on record, chains have passed dealers as the number-one channel for routine service, a 22-point swing in five years.

Routine Service Channel Share, Five-Year Change
Quick Lube and Tire Chains+15 pt
Independent Shops+2 pt
OEM Dealer Service-10 pt
DIY and Other-7 pt
Bars indicate share change, 2019 to 2025
Five Findings

What the report reveals.

Across more than 100,000 service interactions, five patterns explain the shift. Each carries a different implication.

Finding 01

Chains passed dealers as number one, for the first time.

Quick lube and tire chains are now the leading channel for routine service work. Dealer service held the top position for more than two decades.

Finding 02

A 22-point swing in five years. Regular, consistent, confirmed.

The trend is not a single-year aberration. Channel share has moved in the same direction across every panel and every cohort the benchmark tracks.

Finding 03

Chains win on acquisition. Retention tells a different story.

Chains pull customers in through convenience and financing. Once acquired, chain retention is meaningfully lower than dealer retention, which points to a defensible counterposition for the franchise network.

Finding 04

Dealers lead on quality. The market does not know it.

Dealers outperform chains on technical quality and first-time-fix rates. The data is clear. The customer perception is not. The gap is a marketing and experience problem, not a service-quality problem.

Finding 05

The 18-to-24 cohort has moved. The broader market will follow.

Younger drivers have already shifted to chains as their default service channel. Cohort behavior is the leading indicator. The defection pattern visible in this segment will reach the rest of the market within the next cycle.

The dealer network does not have a quality problem. It has a positioning problem. Chains have rewritten the convenience and financing standard, and the rest of the channel has not responded.
What this means for you

Three audiences. Three different plays.

The report sets a shared baseline. The right move depends on where you sit in the channel.

Servicers

Defend acquisition. Strengthen retention.

The convenience and financing advantages that fueled five years of share gains are now table stakes. The next leg of growth requires retention discipline equivalent to the dealer network’s historical rates.

Read in the report

Acquisition-to-retention conversion benchmarks, financing program economics, cohort retention curves

OEM Dealer Councils

Reset the network value proposition.

Dealer service still leads on quality. The data shows the customer is not aware. Council-level coordination on convenience standards, financing parity, and digital service intake is the highest-leverage response.

Read in the report

Quality versus perception data, convenience standard gap analysis, digital service intake benchmarks

Dealer Groups

Identify the stores moving against the trend.

Group-level retention decline is an average. Individual stores are gaining share. The CSS 2025 data isolates what those stores are doing differently and where the playbook can be replicated across the rooftop count.

Read in the report

Top-quartile rooftop analysis, replicable play taxonomy, 18-to-24 cohort capture strategies

Get the Benchmark

The retention shift is structural. The response cannot be incremental.

Download the full Ducker Carlisle Consumer Sentiment Survey: Changing Auto Service Dynamics Benchmark for the seven retention drivers, chain-versus-dealer crosstabs, and the cohort-level data shaping the next cycle of channel competition.

Download the Report Or book a briefing with the Automotive practice →